Fantasy relationships: when you fall for potential, not a person
A fantasy relationship is built on who someone could be, not who they are. Here's how projection, hooks, and future-faking trap you — and how to come back.
A fantasy relationship is one you keep alive in your head — you’ve fallen for who someone could be, not for how they actually behave. Natalie Lue (2017) describes how people fed only emotional breadcrumbs “mentally exaggerate the strength of their relationships.” The tell is simple: your feelings have run far ahead of the evidence, and you defend the gap.
Falling for potential, not a person
The defining move of a fantasy relationship is that you commit to a forecast. You catch glimpses of who someone might become — if they healed, if they were ready, if they finally left the situation keeping them stuck — and you bond with that projected version rather than the one in front of you. Natalie Lue, in The Dreamer and the Fantasy Relationship, is unsentimental about where this leads: the person who wants something casual rarely converts to serious, and the one who keeps almost-introducing you to their family usually never will.
Potential is real. But it belongs to the other person to realise, on their own timeline, for their own reasons. When you organise your hopes around it, you’re effectively dating someone who doesn’t exist yet — and might never. The ordinary, slightly disappointing person in the present keeps losing to the magnificent imagined one in the future, and the imagined one never has a bad day, never lets you down, never has to actually show up.
That’s the first thing to notice: a fantasy relationship is rarely a problem of the other person being uniquely special. It’s a problem of where your attention is pointed — forward, into a story, and away from the evidence.
The three mechanics: exaggeration, projection, hooks
Lue identifies three specific moves that keep a dreamer stuck, and naming them breaks some of their power.
Exaggeration magnifies a person’s good points beyond recognition. They’re not just thoughtful, they’re the most thoughtful person you’ve ever met; not just attractive, but uniquely so. Once their virtues are inflated this far, their flaws can never compete — every disappointment gets absorbed.
Projection goes further: you load the person with everything you need them to be. They become the answer to your loneliness, your shaky self-worth, your uncertain future. This is rarely accurate, but it’s compelling, because now letting them go feels like letting go of all of that at once.
Hooks are the genuine strong points — looks, status, charm, money, kindness — that make you forget the relationship isn’t actually working. As Lue puts it, a man can be successful, funny, and handsome, but if he doesn’t make you feel loved and secure, the hooks shouldn’t count for anything. The skill is learning to feel the hook and discount it anyway.
Why the fantasy is often a hiding place
Here’s the uncomfortable part, and the stance this post takes plainly: the fantasy usually protects you, not just deludes you. Lue’s most counterintuitive insight is that dreamers frequently fear intimacy as much as the unavailable people they pine for. If you truly wanted a reciprocated, present relationship, you could have one — available partners are not rare. What draws you to the few who can’t show up is that they let you experience longing without the risk of being fully seen.
A fantasy gives you the feeling of love with the danger turned down. The other person stays at arm’s length, so you never have to be vulnerable in the way a real bond demands. This reframes the work: the goal isn’t only to stop wanting a particular unavailable person — it’s to get comfortable with the exposure that real intimacy requires. If the pattern keeps repeating across different people, that’s the signal the driver is internal, and our guide on why you keep attracting the same partner maps the loop.
The way back to reality is deliberately slow. Lue’s image is to build a person out of Lego bricks — each real interaction adds one accurate piece, and over time you assemble a true picture instead of forcing a ready-made ideal onto a near-stranger. That means no fast-forwarding, and no minimising what you notice: rude to waiters, chronically late with a flawless excuse, vague about the future — log it. And when it ends, drop the word “rejection.” Most connections don’t work out; a mismatch is information, not a verdict on you. Grieve the imagined future honestly, because losing it is real loss, then point that energy at a life that doesn’t depend on one person finally becoming who you hoped.
References
-
Reference The Dreamer and the Fantasy Relationship
Lue, N. (2017). Naughty Girl Media.
-
Reference Mr Unavailable & the Fallback Girl
Lue, N. (2010). Naughty Girl Media.
FAQ
What is a fantasy relationship?
A **fantasy relationship** is one that exists mostly in your imagination — you're attached to who someone *could* be or what the relationship *might* become, rather than to how they actually behave. **Natalie Lue** (*The Dreamer and the Fantasy Relationship*) describes how people 'mentally exaggerate the strength of their relationships' when fed only emotional breadcrumbs. It can be a barely-real situationship, a long-running crush you never act on, or a connection conducted almost entirely over text. The common thread is that the feeling outpaces the evidence.
What does 'falling in love with potential' actually mean?
It means committing to a forecast instead of a track record. You see flashes of who someone might become — if they healed, if they were ready, if they left their partner — and you bond with that projected version. **Lue** is direct that this is dreaming: the person who wants something casual rarely turns serious, and the one who keeps promising to introduce you to their family usually won't. Potential is real, but it's theirs to realise, not yours to wait on. Falling for potential is falling for a person who doesn't exist yet and may never.
Why do I keep doing this with unavailable people?
Because a fantasy relationship can be a hiding place. **Lue** makes the counterintuitive case that dreamers often *fear intimacy too* — and an unavailable partner is the perfect shield, because you can pour out longing while knowing, somewhere, that it will never demand the vulnerability of a real, reciprocated bond. The fantasy gives you the feeling of love with the risk turned down. If this pattern repeats, our guide on [why you keep attracting the same partner](/en/blog/why-you-keep-attracting-the-same-partner) traces the underlying loop.
What are exaggeration, projection, and hooks?
They're the three mechanics **Lue** says keep dreamers stuck. **Exaggeration** magnifies a person's good points beyond recognition — they're not just kind, they're a saint — so their flaws never count. **Projection** loads them with everything you need: they become the solution to your loneliness, your self-worth, your future. **Hooks** are genuine strong points (looks, status, charm, kindness) that make you forget the relationship isn't actually working. A man can be funny, successful, and handsome — but if he doesn't make you feel loved and secure, the hooks shouldn't count for anything.
How is a fantasy relationship different from limerence?
They overlap but aren't identical. **Limerence** is the involuntary obsessive *state* — intrusive thoughts, craving, the neurochemical high. A fantasy relationship is the *story* you build to justify and sustain that state: the imagined future, the exaggerated virtues, the projected compatibility. You can be limerent without a developed fantasy, and you can run a fantasy with more wistfulness than obsession. In practice they often travel together. For the obsessive-state side, see our piece on [limerence vs love](/en/blog/limerence-vs-love).
Is having relationship fantasies always bad?
No. Imagining a future with someone is normal and even necessary — it's part of how we decide what we want. **Lue's** distinction is about whether the fantasy *blinds you to reality*. A daydream you check against evidence is harmless. A daydream you defend against evidence — explaining away every disappointment, every broken promise, every week of silence — is the problem. The test is simple: when the facts contradict the fantasy, which one do you update?
What is future-faking and how does it feed the fantasy?
**Future-faking** is when someone dangles an idealised future — trips, moving in, 'next year we'll…' — to keep you invested without delivering. **Lue** explains it pairs with **fast-forwarding** (rushing the early intensity) to keep a dreamer supplied with raw material. Crucially, the faker may not even mean to deceive; they often just say what you want to hear. But the effect is the same: you build a fantasy on their words and are left disappointed when the words produce nothing. Watch behaviour over time, not promises. This is a core tell of [an emotionally unavailable partner](/en/blog/signs-of-an-emotionally-unavailable-partner).
How do I stop falling for potential and see the real person?
Slow everything down and let the person emerge fact by fact. **Lue's** image is building someone out of Lego bricks: each interaction adds a real piece, and you assemble an accurate picture over time rather than forcing a ready-made ideal onto a near-stranger. That means no fast-forwarding, and no dismissing what you notice — if they're rude to waiters or chronically late with a great excuse, log it. The whole point of going slowly is that it denies the fantasy the vacuum it needs. If you already feel doubt early, our piece on [heeding the doubt before you commit](/en/blog/heed-the-doubt-before-you-commit) is the companion to this.
How do I let go of a fantasy relationship without feeling rejected?
Reframe the ending as a mismatch, not a verdict on you. **Lue** advises dropping the word 'rejection' from your romantic vocabulary entirely — most relationships don't work out, and that's normal, not a measure of your worth. A connection that ends simply means the dynamic wasn't right, which is information, not a judgment. Grieve the fantasy honestly (you're losing the imagined future, which is real loss), then redirect the energy into a life that doesn't depend on this one person. Our guide on [healing before the next relationship](/en/blog/healing-before-the-next-relationship) covers what to do with the gap it leaves.
Can a fantasy relationship ever become a real one?
Rarely, and only if the other person independently becomes available and you both build on actual behaviour rather than the projection. The danger is mistaking the occasional real moment for proof the fantasy is materialising. **Lue's** rule of thumb is to never fall in love with assumptions — adopt a wait-and-see stance and let the relationship prove itself in the present. If it can only survive on imagined futures and rationed contact, it isn't becoming real; it's staying a fantasy with better PR.